threat_stats

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint true, so the read-only nature is clear. Description adds the licensing requirement but no further behavioral traits (e.g., latency, pagination). Credited for context beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences with purpose first: no wasted words. Efficiently conveys purpose, content, and prerequisite. Well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter statistics tool with an output schema, the description adequately covers what the tool does and returns. Could mention that the JSON structure is defined in the output schema, but that is already available separately.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters; input schema is empty. Description does not need to add parameter details. With 0 parameters, baseline is 4 per guidelines.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it retrieves overall threat intelligence statistics and lists specific metrics (signatures, active threats, mitigated count, severity breakdown). Distinguishes from sibling tools like threat_signature (specific signature) or threat_trending (trending data).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Indicates it provides a high-level summary and requires Pro tier or Novyx Cloud. However, it does not explicitly exclude alternative uses or mention when not to use, though the 'overall' qualifier implies it's for aggregate stats.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.