Skip to main content
Glama

scan_project

Auto-detect and scan lockfiles in a project directory for vulnerabilities, then enrich with EPSS exploit probability and fix recommendations.

Instructions

Auto-detect and scan all lockfiles in a project directory.

Walks the project directory looking for lockfiles (package-lock.json, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) and scans each one. Skips node_modules, .git, and vendor directories.

By default, suppresses low-priority CVEs (EPSS < 10% and CVSS < 9).

Args: project_path: Path to the project root. Defaults to current directory. show_all: Show all vulnerabilities including low-priority ones.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
project_pathNo.
show_allNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses directory traversal, directory exclusions, and default vulnerability filtering. With no annotations, the description handles transparency well, though additional info on mutation or auth would be beneficial.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Efficient, front-loaded summary followed by concise parameter descriptions. No unnecessary text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers all essential aspects given moderate complexity and presence of output schema. Could mention interaction with remote repos.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Both parameters are fully described with defaults and behavior, compensating for 0% schema coverage. Adds meaning beyond raw schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it auto-detects and scans all lockfiles in a project directory, specifying types and distinguishing from siblings like scan_lockfile which scans a single file.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides context on when to use (full project scan) and mentions skipped directories, but lacks explicit alternatives or when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/novadyne-hq/vulnfeed-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server