Skip to main content
Glama
notprathap

NoBounce Email Validation MCP Server

by notprathap

Related Servers

Alternatives to NoBounce Email Validation MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to verify email addresses in real-time, checking syntax, DNS, MX records, and SMTP handshake, returning verdicts and deliverability scores without sending actual emails.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to verify email deliverability and check mailbox existence, manage bulk verification batches, and monitor verification credit balances directly from chat.
      6
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides email validation and domain configuration auditing tools for AI assistants, enabling single address checks, bulk list cleaning, SPF verification, and full mail setup grading (A-F) with actionable fixes.
      4
      41 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to verify email addresses through a multi-signal probabilistic pipeline, returning confidence scores and honest statuses (safe/risky/invalid/unknown) with evidence.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to verify email addresses and receive a 'send', 'hold', or 'kill' verdict with the reason, while also managing signup and credits programmatically.
      5
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to verify email deliverability and find business emails via the Verifox API, supporting single and bulk operations.
      6
      55 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools are cleanly separated by scope: validate_email handles one address, validate_emails_bulk handles batches up to 1,000. There is no realistic scenario where an agent could confuse the two, and the naming itself signals the distinction.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both tools use snake_case with the same validate_ verb and the same email/emails noun stem, giving a predictable pattern. The only minor deviation is the plural-plus-'bulk' qualifier on the batch variant, which is still readable and conventional.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is on the thin side even for a narrow validation service; it is essentially one operation exposed in single and bulk form. The count is defensible for the scope but leaves little surface for account/quota management.

    Completeness4/5

    Single and bulk validation cover the core domain (syntax, MX, disposable, role, free, typo, SMTP) well. The notable gap is the absence of any quota/credits or account-status tool, despite bulk mentioning 'partial-quota handling' — agents cannot inspect remaining quota before large batches.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues