get_configuration_status
Verify whether the Gemini API token is configured to enable AI image generation and editing.
Instructions
Check if Gemini API token is configured
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Verify whether the Gemini API token is configured to enable AI image generation and editing.
Check if Gemini API token is configured
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as return format, side effects, or authentication requirements, leaving the agent uninformed.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence with no redundancy, though it could be slightly more structured (e.g., specifying return type).
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple check tool with no output schema or annotations, the description lacks crucial details about what the check returns (e.g., boolean, error message) and how to interpret results.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, and schema coverage is 100%. Per guidelines, baseline 4 is assigned since the description need not add parameter info.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states verb 'check' and resource 'Gemini API token configuration status', distinguishing it from sibling 'configure_gemini_token' which sets the token.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implied use is to verify configuration status, but no explicit when-to-use, prerequisites, or comparison with alternative tools are provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/notfixingit3/nano-banana-mcpv2'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server