Skip to main content
Glama
notDIRK

fds-mcp

by notDIRK
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to fds-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • recht-mcp

      nulegal-startup
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query German federal and state statutes, court decisions, and citation graphs, grounding citations, retrieving provision texts and versions, and understanding coverage limits through read-only tools.
      9
      AGPL 3.0

    • What Do They Know

      paulieb89
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for UK Freedom of Information research. Connects AI assistants to WhatDoTheyKnow — the UK's largest FOI request platform to search requests, read responses, look up public authorities, and draft new requests.
      8
      MIT

    • Bundestag MCP Server

      oguzhan
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides programmatic access to official German Bundestag parliamentary data, enabling LLMs to answer questions about legislation, voting records, and members.
      1
      MIT

    • German Law MCP

      JustiziusAI
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides LLM-friendly access to German federal legislation via the NeuRIS API, enabling tool-based retrieval of laws, norms, and statutory text.
      8 npm
      MIT

    • Rechtsinformationen Bund DE

      wolfgangihloff
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides access to the official German Federal Legal Information Portal (rechtsinformationen.bund.de) enabling AI agents to search German federal laws, court decisions, and legal documentation with authoritative citations from official sources.
      5
      23
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool maps to a distinct resource or action: authority lookup, jurisdiction resolution, request retrieval, message/attachment access, deadline checks, and the draft/submit pipeline. Even the several draft-related tools are clearly separated by request vs reply and validate/build/submit roles.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names mostly follow a clear verb_noun pattern like list_my_requests, get_request, download_attachment, and submit_request. Minor inconsistencies exist, such as create_request_draft vs build_reply_draft and get_messages vs list_attachments, but the overall convention remains predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 15 tools, the server is at the upper edge of a well-scoped set but each tool earns its place. The count reflects a complete workflow: discovery, retrieval, attachments, deadlines, draft validation, URL generation, and submission.

    Completeness4/5

    The domain is well covered: authority and law lookup, request/message/attachment retrieval, deadline checking, request drafting/validation/submission, and reply drafting all exist. The main gap is that reply submission is not provided by any tool, though the description explains this is an API limitation and the workflow hands off to a human.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources