bamboo_health_check
Check the health status of your Bamboo server to ensure it is running properly.
Instructions
Check Bamboo server health status
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Check the health status of your Bamboo server to ensure it is running properly.
Check Bamboo server health status
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavior. It only says 'check...health status' implying read-only, but lacks details on what constitutes a health check, potential side effects, or authentication needs.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One sentence, no unnecessary words. Perfectly concise for a simple health check tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple health check with no parameters and no output schema, the description is adequate but minimal. It could hint at expected return values (e.g., 'returns status JSON').
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, so the schema provides no additional info. The description adds the purpose of checking health status, which is sufficient for a parameterless tool.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool checks Bamboo server health status. It is specific and distinguishable from sibling tools like bamboo_server_info which might return more general server info.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like bamboo_server_info. Lacks context about prerequisites or typical use cases.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/norus/atlassian-bamboo-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server