Skip to main content
Glama
northbeamsoftware

warpweb-mcp

by northbeamsoftware
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to warpweb-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Kleap by kleaphq

      Kleapofficial

      kleaphq
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to build, edit, and publish live websites with hosting, database, auth, and domains via the Model Context Protocol.
      13
      17 npm
      1
      MIT

    • krexel-mcp

      Syfer-web
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to deploy, manage, and rollback websites via the Krexel API, supporting site uploads, deploys, logs, rollbacks, environment variables, and status checks.
      9
      57 npm
      MIT

    • unulu

      unulu-ai
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      AI agent website builder, starting with link-in-bio sites. Create and publish via MCP server or REST API.
      2
      MIT
    • SiteCTRL by sitectrl-ai

      SiteCTRLofficial

      sitectrl-ai
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      sitectrl turns a plain-language description into a real, hosted, live website — not a mockup. Your AI can ask sitectrl's builder to do it (create_site), or write the code itself and push the files (write_site_files + publish_site). Every site ships with hosting, SSL, working contact forms, and private built-in analytics; domains and email connect in-product.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: listing vs. retrieving sites, searching vs. creating, domain check vs. register vs. attach, and webhook configuration. Even the related create_site and create_revision are well separated by their descriptions (initial build vs. edit).

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with lowercase snake_case: list_sites, search_businesses, create_site, get_site, refresh_site, create_revision, check_domain, register_domain, attach_domain, configure_form_webhook. No mixed conventions or vague verbs.

    Tool Count5/5

    10 tools is well-scoped for a website management server. Each tool covers a distinct operation in the site lifecycle, domain management, and configuration, with no redundant or token tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full creation flow (search, create, poll), revisions, refresh, domain registration/attachment, and webhook setup. Missing delete/archive site and domain detach operations are notable but minor gaps that do not break core workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources