No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 24 tools
Tools are mostly distinct, but there is overlap between get_work and read_task (both retrieve work items/tasks) and between list_objectives and list_all_objectives_with_key_results. The descriptions provide some guidance, but an agent may struggle to choose the right tool for reading a specific task or objective.
The naming follows a verb_noun pattern, but verbs are inconsistent: get, read, list, discover, load, upsert. For example, get_project uses 'get' while read_task uses 'read', and list_objectives is a 'list' while list_all_objectives_with_key_results is also a list but with a qualifier. oauth_ping does not follow the pattern.
With 24 tools, the server covers multiple domains (projects, tasks, financial plans, OKRs) without being excessive. The count is reasonable for the complexity of Planview Portfolios, though a few tools could be merged (e.g., list_objectives into list_all_objectives_with_key_results).
The tool set covers core CRUD for projects and tasks (though task update is not explicit, only update_work), reading for OKRs, and financial plan operations. However, there are gaps: no create/update/delete for objectives, no delete for financial plans, and no search or portfolio-level operations. References to Beta MCP alternatives suggest intentional gaps.
