list_pi_sessions
List all active coding agent sessions and check their status to monitor ongoing worker activities.
Instructions
List all active sessions and their status.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List all active coding agent sessions and check their status to monitor ongoing worker activities.
List all active sessions and their status.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Only states 'list all active sessions and their status' without disclosing potential limitations (e.g., pagination, data freshness) or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single sentence with no waste. Every word is necessary and front-loaded with the action and subject.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple list tool with 0 parameters and no output schema, but lacks details on what 'status' entails or any filtering options. Could be more thorough.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so baseline 4 applies. Description adds no parameter info, but schema coverage is 100% trivially.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool lists all active sessions and their status, using specific verbs and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like spawn_pi_session or terminate_pi_session.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as get_pending_actions or get_auto_approved_log. The description does not mention exclusions or context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/noosxe/worker-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server