Interactive Feedback MCP
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| interactive_feedbackB | Request interactive feedback for a given project directory and summary |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The single tool 'interactive_feedback' serves a unique purpose.
The single tool name follows a clear verb_noun pattern ('interactive_feedback'), and there are no other names to compare for inconsistency.
The server is dedicated to interactive feedback, and one tool is perfectly scoped for this narrow purpose. Adding more tools would be unnecessary.
For the stated purpose of requesting interactive feedback on a project directory and summary, this single tool fully covers the expected functionality with no obvious gaps.