@erickwendel/ciphersuite-mcp
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| encrypt_messageC | Encrypt a message |
| decrypt_messageB | Decrypt a message that was encrypted with the encrypt_message tool |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| encrypt_message_prompt | Prompt to encrypt a plain-text message using the encrypt_message tool |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| encryption_info | Describes the encryption algorithm, key requirements, and output format used by this server |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have mutually exclusive and clearly defined purposes: one encrypts, the other decrypts. There is no possible confusion between them, as the operations are exact inverses and each description explicitly points to the other.
Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (encrypt_message, decrypt_message). The naming is predictable and symmetrical, making the intent immediately obvious without needing to read descriptions.
With only two tools, the server covers a narrow but coherent feature set. While this is on the low end, it is not unreasonable for a dedicated cipher suite that aims to provide basic symmetric encryption and decryption. The count is thin, but not absurdly so for the stated scope.
The tool surface covers the fundamental encrypt/decrypt cycle, but lacks other expected operations in a cipher suite, such as key generation, rotation, or support for additional algorithms. For a simple utility, this might be sufficient, but it leaves notable gaps for real-world use cases.