dns_list_app_store

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description provides minimal behavioral context but accurately states the tool's read-only listing function. It does not mention potential nuances like network dependencies or response structure, but for a simple listing operation this is acceptable.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that concisely captures the tool's action, object, and meaningful output fields. There is no unnecessary verbosity, making it well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the description does not elaborate on response format or other metadata, it covers the essential aspects for a no-input, listing tool. The mention of versions and descriptions gives the agent a clear idea of what to expect in the output.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the description has no parameter semantics to add. According to the baseline for zero-parameter tools, a score of 4 is warranted.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the tool as a listing operation for available apps in the Technitium DNS app store, and specifies the included fields (versions, descriptions). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like dns_list_apps, which likely lists installed apps rather than store-available ones.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives such as dns_list_apps. The purpose implies usage when browsing the app store, but no direct comparison or exclusion is offered, so the guidance remains implicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.