A
licenseNot graded
qualityB
maintenanceEU Crop Intelligence MCP Server — Yield forecasts, weather analysis, and phenology models for 15 countries. AI agent-native, multi-source intelligence (NASA POWER, Eurostat, Open-Meteo).
MIT
EUDR Compliance & TRACES-NT Agent
Related Servers
Alternatives to EUDR Compliance & TRACES-NT Agent
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables EU AI Act compliance for AI agent systems by providing risk classification, audit trails, gap analysis, and evidence package generation.40 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to seal, open, verify, and ingest verifiable agri-traceability data by description, with credentials and private keys kept out of the model's flow.16 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceAutonomous M2M compliance and trust APIs for AI agents (KYB, OFAC, VAT, Sanctions checking).5MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceProvides tamper-proof audit logging for AI agents using SHA-256 hash chains, integrity verification, and compliance reporting for the EU AI Act.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEU Digital Identity Wallet (eIDAS 2.0) for AI agents, compliant with MCP protocol and EU AI Act.48 PyPIMIT
TDQS
B3.2/5.0
Scored across 41 tools
Disambiguation3/5
Many tools target distinct EUDR objects, but there are overlapping clusters in escrow/payment settlement, dispute resolution, and compliance evaluation. Detailed descriptions help, yet an agent could still confuse tools like eudr_agent_micro_pay, eudr_agent_eip3009_pay, and eudr_solana_settle_escrow, or eudr_arbitrate_agent_escrow and eudr_auto_slash_disputed_escrow.
Naming Consistency4/5
All tool names use the eudr_ prefix and snake_case, with a mostly predictable verb_noun pattern. A few names reverse order or embed modifiers (e.g. eudr_agent_micro_pay, eudr_agent_eip3009_pay), but the convention remains readable and consistent overall.
Tool Count2/5
The server exposes 41 tools, which is excessive for a single MCP server and well above the 3-15 well-scoped range. While the EUDR compliance domain is broad, this many tools increases selection complexity and maintenance burden.
Completeness4/5
Coverage is strong across compliance evaluation, DDS/TRACES generation, customs clearance, satellite checks, registry/VAT verification, and escrow/payment lifecycles. Minor gaps exist around querying or listing existing RFQs, bids, escrows, and DDS statuses, but core workflows are well represented.
Maintenance
ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo issues