search_saxo_endpoints

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description must carry behavioral transparency. It only states 'Search', implying a read-only operation, but does not disclose any side effects, authentication needs, or rate limits. The description fails to add meaningful behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence of 9 words, efficiently conveying the core purpose without unnecessary detail. However, it could include more information in the same space.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has an output schema, so the description need not detail return values, but it lacks context such as the scope of search, potential omissions, or behavior with no results. For a search tool, more completeness is expected.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage—the 'query' parameter has no description beyond its name. The description merely says 'by keyword', adding no semantic value about the format, constraints, or intended use of the query parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Search' and the resource 'Saxo Bank OpenAPI endpoints', indicating it is a search tool. While it distinguishes from sibling tools that retrieve specs or schemas, it could be more specific about the search scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus its siblings (get_saxo_endpoint_spec, get_saxo_schema_spec, get_saxo_workflow_guide). There is no indication of prerequisites or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.