Skip to main content
Glama
node2flow-th

gemini-file-search-rag-mcp

by node2flow-th

Related Servers

Alternatives to gemini-file-search-rag-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A complete MCP server for Retrieval-Augmented Generation with file management and vector memory for agents. Supports multiple document formats (PDF, DOCX, TXT, MD, CSV, JSON) with semantic search using Hugging Face embeddings and ChromaDB for efficient vector storage.
      11
      6 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides 8 local RAG tools using LlamaIndex and Ollama, enabling AI-powered document querying, summarization, analysis, and comparison over PDFs, DOCX, XLSX, and CSV files.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      RAG-enabled MCP server that uses Google Gemini for embeddings and Supabase for vector storage, enabling semantic search and document similarity matching through natural language queries.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource+action (store CRUD, document CRUD, query), but two pairs risk confusion: gemini_get_operation vs gemini_get_upload_operation both poll operation status, and gemini_upload_to_store vs gemini_import_file_to_store both ingest content. The descriptions do clarify the distinctions (store vs upload operations; direct content vs Files API), keeping it mostly clean.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool follows the same gemini_<verb>_<noun> convention (gemini_list_stores, gemini_get_store, gemini_delete_document, gemini_rag_query). The pattern is predictable and uniform across all 12 tools.

    Tool Count5/5

    12 tools is well-scoped for a RAG/file-search server, covering store lifecycle, document lifecycle, ingestion, operation polling, and query. Each tool earns its place without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    Store lifecycle (create/get/list/delete) and document read/delete plus ingestion and query are well covered. Minor gaps exist: no store/document update or rename operation, and document creation is only via upload/import, but core workflows are complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues