Get inspiration details

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark this as read-only and open-world, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds useful behavioral context by explaining exactly what detail is returned and that include_preview returns the first screenshot inline, though it does not discuss pagination or rate limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core purpose and uses compact parenthetical detail. It is slightly dense in one long sentence, but nearly every clause adds actionable return-value context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description carries the burden of explaining what comes back, and it does so thoroughly by listing metadata and screenshot categories. It is nearly complete for a read-only detail endpoint, with only minor gaps around error behavior or missing-item handling.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is only 33%, so the description needs to compensate. It explains include_preview's effect clearly and clarifies that kind affects whether website or app screenshot sets are returned; slug semantics are left to the schema, but the key behavioral parameter meaning is present.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a precise verb and resource: retrieve full details for one Godly item. It enumerates the returned content (description, live URL, metadata, screenshot URLs), which clearly distinguishes this detail-fetching tool from search/list siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'for one Godly item' implies this is the detail lookup after finding an item, and the slug schema mentions search_inspiration. However, the description itself does not explicitly name alternatives or state when to use this versus search_inspiration or list_section_inspiration.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.