Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to lighthouse-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Core Web Vitals analysis powered by Lighthouse. Four tools: analyze a URL, compare two URLs, check against thresholds, or crawl an entire site. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, and any MCP-compatible AI tool.
      4
      9 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI agents to perform comprehensive web audits using Google Lighthouse with 13+ tools for performance, accessibility, SEO, and security analysis.
      11
      2,778 npm
      71
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI models to perform Google Lighthouse website performance analysis, including Core Web Vitals, accessibility, SEO audits, and actionable optimization recommendations. Provides comprehensive web performance insights through natural language interactions.
      1,359 npm
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to run fresh audits of any public web page on mobile or desktop, returning category scores, lab metrics, and prioritized findings for performance, accessibility, best practices, and SEO. Each call performs a new uncached audit, so users can compare results within a conversation.
      1
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools are clearly distinct: audit_url handles a single URL while audit_batch handles multiple URLs. There is no overlap or ambiguity in their purposes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools use the consistent verb_noun pattern (audit_url, audit_batch), making the naming predictable and easy to follow.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a full-featured Lighthouse server, though the tools cover the core audit functionality. It is below the typical 3-15 range.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover both single and batch audits, returning comprehensive metrics and opportunities. Minor gaps include lack of custom configuration options (e.g., device, categories) or historical comparison, but these are not critical.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues