Skip to main content
Glama
noGarne

lighthouse-mcp

by noGarne
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to lighthouse-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • LightScout MCP

      bobbyrgoldsmith
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Core Web Vitals analysis powered by Lighthouse. Four tools: analyze a URL, compare two URLs, check against thresholds, or crawl an entire site. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, and any MCP-compatible AI tool.
      4
      10 npm
      MIT

    • Lighthouse MCP

      danielsogl
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI agents to perform comprehensive web audits using Google Lighthouse with 13+ tools for performance, accessibility, SEO, and security analysis.
      11
      994 npm
      70
      MIT

    • Lighthouse MCP

      mizchi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI models to perform Google Lighthouse website performance analysis, including Core Web Vitals, accessibility, SEO audits, and actionable optimization recommendations. Provides comprehensive web performance insights through natural language interactions.
      752 npm
      4
      MIT

    • pagespeed-insights-mcp

      damijanc
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      This MCP server integrates Google PageSpeed Insights to analyze website performance, accessibility, best practices, SEO, and PWA on mobile and desktop, returning detailed audits and optimization opportunities.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools are clearly distinct: audit_url handles a single URL while audit_batch handles multiple URLs. There is no overlap or ambiguity in their purposes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools use the consistent verb_noun pattern (audit_url, audit_batch), making the naming predictable and easy to follow.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a full-featured Lighthouse server, though the tools cover the core audit functionality. It is below the typical 3-15 range.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover both single and batch audits, returning comprehensive metrics and opportunities. Minor gaps include lack of custom configuration options (e.g., device, categories) or historical comparison, but these are not critical.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources