SecondBrain
Related Servers
Alternatives to SecondBrain
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA local-first MCP server that manages developer memory for coding agents, enabling shared project context, permissions, and audit trails across different agents.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server providing persistent, local-first memory for AI agents via Markdown files in a git repo, with search, branching, and auditability.3 npm2MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceLocal-first memory server for AI coding agents that stores work sessions, tasks, and durable memories in Markdown files, exposed through MCP tools for session management and memory retrieval.1011 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI agents persistent, file-based memory stored as plain markdown files in a local git repository, enabling agents to remember, recall, and build on information across sessions.1 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for persistent, cross-session, local-first memory for AI agents, storing memories as Markdown files with SQLite indexing for hybrid search.24Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA self-hosted MCP server that gives AI agents shared, long-term memory over a git-backed folder of markdown, enabling persistent knowledge search, read, and write without a database.166 npm16MIT
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Each tool targets a distinct action/resource: search vs. get vs. recent logs, and a clean memory_candidate_* sub-namespace (get/list/create/approve/reject/expire) that is explicitly isolated from canonical memory. The three write paths (capture, update, candidate_create) are clearly differentiated by descriptions. No two tools appear interchangeable.
All 16 tools use a uniform memory_ prefix in snake_case with a predictable verb_noun structure (memory_get, memory_search, memory_capture, memory_update). The memory_candidate_* lifecycle is a consistent nested naming sub-pattern rather than a deviation.
16 tools is at the upper edge of comfortable, driven by a full five-tool candidate-review lifecycle. For a knowledge base with retrieval, audit, eval, and index management, each tool earns its place, though the surface is slightly heavy.
The surface covers the full lifecycle: creation (capture/create), read (get/search/related/recent), update (update, approve), review governance (candidate list/approve/reject/expire), plus audit, eval, rebuild, and status. Append-only design intentionally omits canonical delete, so no meaningful dead ends remain.