Skip to main content
Glama
nmarijane

LightSpot MCP Server

by nmarijane

Related Servers

Alternatives to LightSpot MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to run live SEO/readiness audits against 50+ AI crawlers, validate schema and robots.txt, and generate llms.txt, robots.txt, and JSON-LD files directly from MCP-compatible clients like Claude Desktop and Cursor.
      8
      728 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude and other MCP clients to read Google Search Console and Bing Webmaster Tools data, analyze query/page performance, compare periods, inspect indexing and canonical status, and retrieve sitemap and keyword statistics.
      23
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes OptiQra's full SEO/GEO/AEO audit and AI-fix/insight tools as MCP tools for AI clients like Claude, Cursor, and Windsurf. Use natural language to crawl URLs, analyze performance/a11y/security, and generate AI-driven fixes and strategy insights.
      4
      29 npm
      MIT
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform comprehensive SEO and GEO measurements, including site audits, keyword research, ranking tracking, and brand visibility analysis across search engines and generative AI platforms.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform live Google SERP searches, run on-page and full-site SEO audits with prioritized fixes, and check brand visibility in AI answer engines via four MCP tools.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: run_audit vs audit_and_wait (async vs blocking), get_audit_status (lightweight) vs get_audit (full results), and get_editorial_calendar vs create_editorial_calendar (read vs write) are well-separated by their descriptions. Minor overlap exists between get_audit and get_expert_report (both surface audit-derived output) and between get_site and list_site_audits, but the descriptions clarify the boundaries.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Ten of eleven names follow a predictable verb_noun pattern (get_*, list_*, run_audit, create_editorial_calendar), which is highly consistent. The lone deviation is audit_and_wait, which inverts to a noun_and_verb compound and breaks the otherwise uniform convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eleven tools is a well-scoped set for an SEO/GEO audit platform, comfortably within the ideal 3-15 range. Each tool earns its place by covering a distinct phase: audit triggering, polling, results retrieval, site lookup, and calendar management.

    Completeness4/5

    The audit lifecycle is well covered (trigger, poll, fetch, expert report, wait convenience), and the editorial calendar supports read plus idempotent import. Gaps remain in write operations for sites (no create/delete) and the inability to trigger a new competitor analysis or delete calendar slots, but these are workable given the read-heavy workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues