LightSpot MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to LightSpot MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceChecks a website's AI readiness: can ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI and 50+ other AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot) access it? Scores the site, then generates llms.txt, an AI-crawler robots.txt and JSON-LD, and reads LLM Monitor trends, from Claude Desktop, Cursor and other MCP clients.8206 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables SEO audits and URL monitoring via the SEO Radar API from any MCP-compatible AI client.75 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude and other MCP clients to read Google Search Console and Bing Webmaster Tools data, analyze query/page performance, compare periods, inspect indexing and canonical status, and retrieve sitemap and keyword statistics.232,007 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to run evidence-first technical SEO and GEO audits, inspect HTML, structured data, robots policies and sitemaps, and compare before/after reports to verify fixes.51MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceExposes OptiQra's full SEO/GEO/AEO audit and AI-fix/insight tools as MCP tools for AI clients like Claude, Cursor, and Windsurf. Use natural language to crawl URLs, analyze performance/a11y/security, and generate AI-driven fixes and strategy insights.432 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to run SEO audits and reporting over a user's own Search Console, Google Analytics, Bing, and keyword/competitor provider data, including page/index status, traffic comparisons, backlinks, and local crawl/internal-link analysis.1,975 npm585Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: run_audit vs audit_and_wait (async vs blocking), get_audit_status (lightweight) vs get_audit (full results), and get_editorial_calendar vs create_editorial_calendar (read vs write) are well-separated by their descriptions. Minor overlap exists between get_audit and get_expert_report (both surface audit-derived output) and between get_site and list_site_audits, but the descriptions clarify the boundaries.
Ten of eleven names follow a predictable verb_noun pattern (get_*, list_*, run_audit, create_editorial_calendar), which is highly consistent. The lone deviation is audit_and_wait, which inverts to a noun_and_verb compound and breaks the otherwise uniform convention.
Eleven tools is a well-scoped set for an SEO/GEO audit platform, comfortably within the ideal 3-15 range. Each tool earns its place by covering a distinct phase: audit triggering, polling, results retrieval, site lookup, and calendar management.
The audit lifecycle is well covered (trigger, poll, fetch, expert report, wait convenience), and the editorial calendar supports read plus idempotent import. Gaps remain in write operations for sites (no create/delete) and the inability to trigger a new competitor analysis or delete calendar slots, but these are workable given the read-heavy workflow.