get_new_releases

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, but the description details the return structure and parameter defaults/limits, implying a read-only operation. It does not disclose potential rate limits or side effects, but the return schema adds transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with clear sections for Arguments, Returns, and nested lists. It is slightly long but all parts are informative and earned their place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the output schema embedded in the description, all return values are documented. Parameters are fully explained. Sibling tools provide differentiation context. The tool is self-contained and complete for its purpose.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage, so the description adds full meaning: explaining country as a country code, limit as max number (20, max 50), offset as index. This significantly compensates for the schema's lack of descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a clear verb+resource pattern ('Get new album releases') which distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_album or get_artist. It immediately conveys the tool's function.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

While no explicit when-to-use vs alternatives is given, the context of 'new releases' is clear and the sibling tools list helps the agent differentiate. A brief exclusion statement could improve, but it's not necessary.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.