Skip to main content
Glama
nlaanait

my-lit-mcp

by nlaanait
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to my-lit-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • literature-bot-mcp

      Remus-cloud
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables local literature workflows by searching arXiv, retrieving paper metadata, downloading and parsing PDFs, and retrieving page-cited body evidence for Q&A. It also exposes usage resources and templates for searching, analyzing, and summarizing papers via stdio MCP.
      4
      MIT

    • PubMed MCP Server

      Sokolov547
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables searching PubMed and Europe PMC, fetching article metadata and full text via PMC, Europe PMC, or Unpaywall, resolving citations and identifiers, and grounding queries in MeSH vocabulary. It exposes these capabilities as MCP tools, a database-info resource, and a research-planning prompt over stdio or Streamable HTTP.
      9 npm
      MIT

    • Scholar Library

      SAKURAfan1023
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables locally-first literature research through an MCP host by collecting sources, parsing documents, retrieving evidence, validating citations, and exporting research records in multiple formats.
      38
      MIT

    • Athena

      Vis-3
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local academic research assistant that indexes PDFs into a searchable vector library and exposes MCP tools for semantic search, claim extraction, contradiction detection, and multi-step research synthesis.
      -

    • Fastcat Literature MCP

      achuthc1298
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables an AI assistant to search scientific literature across OpenAlex and Semantic Scholar, download supported Elsevier and Springer Nature full texts, and build a local searchable index so questions can be answered with citations to original paper passages. It runs locally over stdio with CPU-based embeddings and needs no Qdrant account, Docker, GPU, or LLM API key of its own.
      11
      MIT

    • pubmed-mcp-server

      catherineabdullah69668
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables searching PubMed and Europe PMC, fetching article metadata and full text via PMC/Europe PMC/Unpaywall, formatting citations, resolving partial references and identifiers, and grounding queries in MeSH vocabulary. Runs over stdio or Streamable HTTP, exposing these biomedical literature capabilities as MCP tools, a resource, and a prompt.
      9 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources or actions: seed CRUD, feedback, workspace setup, and retrieval are clearly separated. The main overlap is between search_local (which includes fulltext) and search_fulltext, plus similar_to may be confused with local search, though descriptions clarify the intended scope.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names consistently use snake_case and are readable, with many following verb_noun patterns like list_seeds, add_seed, get_paper, and search_local. A few names such as new_since, must_read, and similar_to deviate from verb_noun but remain understandable and stylistically consistent.

    Tool Count4/5

    The 16 tools are just above the typical 3-15 range, but each appears to serve a specific function across workspace setup, seed management, search, retrieval, feedback, and status reporting. The set is slightly heavy but not bloated for a local literature management server.

    Completeness3/5

    Core seed CRUD, search, fulltext retrieval, feedback, and corpus status are covered well. However, query management is only partially exposed via list_queries with no add/remove/update tools, and there is no explicit ingestion or PDF parsing trigger, which are notable gaps for the literature workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources