No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 16 tools
Most tools target distinct resources or actions: seed CRUD, feedback, workspace setup, and retrieval are clearly separated. The main overlap is between search_local (which includes fulltext) and search_fulltext, plus similar_to may be confused with local search, though descriptions clarify the intended scope.
Tool names consistently use snake_case and are readable, with many following verb_noun patterns like list_seeds, add_seed, get_paper, and search_local. A few names such as new_since, must_read, and similar_to deviate from verb_noun but remain understandable and stylistically consistent.
The 16 tools are just above the typical 3-15 range, but each appears to serve a specific function across workspace setup, seed management, search, retrieval, feedback, and status reporting. The set is slightly heavy but not bloated for a local literature management server.
Core seed CRUD, search, fulltext retrieval, feedback, and corpus status are covered well. However, query management is only partially exposed via list_queries with no add/remove/update tools, and there is no explicit ingestion or PDF parsing trigger, which are notable gaps for the literature workflow.