Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to my-lit-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables local literature workflows by searching arXiv, retrieving paper metadata, downloading and parsing PDFs, and retrieving page-cited body evidence for Q&A. It also exposes usage resources and templates for searching, analyzing, and summarizing papers via stdio MCP.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables locally-first literature research through an MCP host by collecting sources, parsing documents, retrieving evidence, validating citations, and exporting research records in multiple formats.
      38
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local academic research assistant that indexes PDFs into a searchable vector library and exposes MCP tools for semantic search, claim extraction, contradiction detection, and multi-step research synthesis.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables an AI assistant to search scientific literature across OpenAlex and Semantic Scholar, download supported Elsevier and Springer Nature full texts, and build a local searchable index so questions can be answered with citations to original paper passages. It runs locally over stdio with CPU-based embeddings and needs no Qdrant account, Docker, GPU, or LLM API key of its own.
      11
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local-first paper RAG server that enables searching and managing academic PDFs via MCP tools, supporting metadata enrichment and citation graphs.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local MCP server for searching scientific papers, retrieving metadata and abstracts, and legally downloading Open Access PDFs via OpenAlex, CrossRef, and Unpaywall APIs.
      5
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources or actions: seed CRUD, feedback, workspace setup, and retrieval are clearly separated. The main overlap is between search_local (which includes fulltext) and search_fulltext, plus similar_to may be confused with local search, though descriptions clarify the intended scope.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names consistently use snake_case and are readable, with many following verb_noun patterns like list_seeds, add_seed, get_paper, and search_local. A few names such as new_since, must_read, and similar_to deviate from verb_noun but remain understandable and stylistically consistent.

    Tool Count4/5

    The 16 tools are just above the typical 3-15 range, but each appears to serve a specific function across workspace setup, seed management, search, retrieval, feedback, and status reporting. The set is slightly heavy but not bloated for a local literature management server.

    Completeness3/5

    Core seed CRUD, search, fulltext retrieval, feedback, and corpus status are covered well. However, query management is only partially exposed via list_queries with no add/remove/update tools, and there is no explicit ingestion or PDF parsing trigger, which are notable gaps for the literature workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues