zabbix_listar_triggers

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden, and it discloses nothing: not whether listing is read-only (implied at best), not pagination semantics for limite/offset, not default scoping, not result ordering. Only the number of sentences signals a simple read, which is inference rather than disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Very short, so there is little waste, but the leftover "34." prefix is noise and the single sentence is under-specified rather than concise. Front-loading is fine but the payload is thin.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, which reduces the need to describe return values, but for a 4-parameter list tool with no annotations the description leaves filtering, pagination, and status semantics completely unexplained. Not enough for an agent to call it confidently.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Four parameters (hostid, limite, offset, status) sit at 0% schema description coverage, and the description adds no meaning to any of them — it never says that hostid filters by host, what status values mean, or that limite/offset paginate. The description does nothing to compensate for the schema gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a verb ("Listar") and resource ("triggers") plus a vague mention of "configurações", but gives no way to distinguish it from the sibling zabbix_consultar_trigger or zabbix_listar_problemas. A leading ordinal ("34.") is leftover noise from a doc list, not disambiguation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No indication of when to use this listing tool versus zabbix_consultar_trigger or the problem/event tools. No prerequisites, no mention of what filters are appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.