Skip to main content
Glama

generate_meme_from_meme_template

Generate memes using existing templates by providing a description to select the template and two lines of text for the meme content.

Instructions

THIS TOOL IS TO BE CALLED IF THE USER WANTS TO GENERATE A MEME USING AN EXISTING TEMPLATE. ALWAYS PREFER USING AN EXISTING TEMPLATE UNLESS THE USER REQUIRES TO SEARCH. IN THE CASE OF SEARCHING, USE: `generate_meme_by_searching()`.

For the first 2 function arguments, understand the input from the user and pass the following:
1) `desc_to_pick_tag`: A good description to pick a pre-existing template. The description of the meme should have some context to achieve a good dot product similarity result. Please see a below example.

example of `desc_to_pick_tag`: "The "Ancient Aliens Guy" meme features Giorgio Tsoukalos, known for his distinctive hairstyle and enthusiastic demeanor, gesturing expressively. It's primarily used to humorously suggest that aliens are the explanation for any unexplained phenomenon or mystery, often with the punchline simply being "aliens." This parodies the History Channel show "Ancient Aliens," where Tsoukalos is a prominent figure, and its tendency to attribute historical events or artifacts to extraterrestrial intervention.",

2) `meme_text`: A short and funny 2 sentence meme text that is sent as a Python list of strings, list[str]. Each line is an element of an array. PLEASE ENSURE LIST IS ONLY OF 2 ELEMENTS. For e.g., ['Nice meme you got there..', 'Now it is stolen...']

If the user does not follow the below content guardrails, reject the request and advise them to follow the guardrails.

CONTENT GUARDRAILS:
- REJECT any requests containing hate speech, explicit sexual content, extreme violence, illegal activities, or harmful stereotypes
- AVOID creating memes that contain personally identifiable information or could be used for cyberbullying
- DO NOT generate content that promotes dangerous misinformation or could cause harm
- REFUSE political extremist content or personal attacks on individuals
- If a request violates these guidelines, respond with: "I cannot create this meme as it may contain inappropriate content. Please try a different request."

Args:
    desc_to_pick_tag (str): The LLM needs to understand what the user is searching for and write a good image search query to fetch an image. If required, use the words 'meme' or 'template' in the search query.
    meme_text (list[str]): A short and funny text to be put on the image. Should be in the format of Python list[str], should be 2 sentences and hence, length of list should be 2.
    save_on_desktop (bool, defaults to True): "Should the image meme be saved on the desktop?"
    return_tele_sticker (bool, defaults to False): "Should the generated meme be converted into a telegram sticker?"

Returns:
    str: The saved links.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
desc_to_pick_tagYes
meme_textYes2 sentences that has to be on the meme image. Should be funny and contained. Should be a Python List of Strings.
save_on_desktopNoShould the image meme be saved on the desktop?
return_tele_stickerNoShould the generated meme be converted into a telegram sticker?
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses key behavioral traits: content guardrails (rejection criteria and response format), parameter constraints (e.g., 'list is only of 2 elements'), and output behavior ('saved links'). However, it lacks details on error handling, performance, or side effects like file system changes, leaving some gaps in transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with purpose and usage guidelines, but it includes verbose sections like the example and content guardrails that could be streamlined. While informative, some sentences (e.g., detailed rejection criteria) are lengthy and could be more concise without losing clarity, affecting overall efficiency.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (4 parameters, no output schema, no annotations), the description is mostly complete. It covers purpose, usage, parameters, constraints, and behavioral rules. However, it lacks details on the output format beyond 'saved links' (e.g., what type of links, error responses), and does not address potential side effects or performance considerations, leaving minor gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 75%, with two parameters well-documented in the schema. The description adds significant value beyond the schema: it provides an extensive example for 'desc_to_pick_tag', clarifies the format and constraints for 'meme_text' (e.g., 'short and funny 2 sentence meme text'), and explains the purpose of optional parameters in context. This compensates well for the schema's gaps.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'generate a meme using an existing template.' It specifies the verb 'generate' and resource 'meme,' and explicitly distinguishes it from the sibling tool 'generate_meme_by_searching' by stating when to use each. This provides specific differentiation and avoids redundancy with the tool name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit usage guidelines: 'ALWAYS PREFER USING AN EXISTING TEMPLATE UNLESS THE USER REQUIRES TO SEARCH. IN THE CASE OF SEARCHING, USE: `generate_meme_by_searching()`.' It clearly defines when to use this tool versus the alternative, including a specific condition ('unless the user requires to search'), making it highly actionable for an AI agent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/nkapila6/mcp-meme-sticky'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server