Weather MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| get_alertsA | Get weather alerts for a US state. Args: state: Two-letter US state code (e.g. CA, NY) |
| get_forecastC | Get weather forecast for a location. Args: latitude: Latitude of the location longitude: Longitude of the location |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one for weather alerts by state, one for forecast by coordinates. No overlap or ambiguity.
Both tools follow the consistent 'get_<resource>' pattern (get_alerts, get_forecast), with clear nouns indicating the resource type.
With only 2 tools, the server feels minimal but adequately covers its stated purpose of weather alerts and forecasts. It is at the lower bound of acceptable scope.
The server covers alerts and forecasts, but lacks current conditions, historical data, or other common weather queries. Basic coverage, but notable gaps exist.