Skip to main content
Glama
nishant20

testgen-eval

by nishant20
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to testgen-eval

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Swagger Testcase MCP

      eyaushev
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server for API test case generation from Swagger/OpenAPI specs. Parses Swagger 2.0 and OpenAPI 3.x, generates test cases across 8 categories (positive, negative, boundary, auth, security, idempotency, pagination, business logic), and exports to Postman, TestRail, Allure, k6, pytest, Gherkin, and CSV. Supports internal corporate APIs with auth headers. Auto-saves export files to your working di
      10
      12
      2
      MIT

    • testmonitor-mcp

      deanchong
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with TestMonitor projects, test cases, test runs, results, issues, and more through a local stdio MCP server generated from the official REST API specification.
      -

    • AI Test Pilot

      Drzymek92
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that generates, runs, and triages tests by introspecting Python modules or web pages, using structured LLM outputs for scenario generation and failure analysis.
      1
      MIT

    • TestRail MCP Server

      uarlouski
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      AI-native Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for TestRail. Lets Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and other AI assistants browse projects, create and update test cases, kick off test runs, and record results through natural-language conversation — with strongly-typed tool schemas and per-project custom field validation that helps LLMs generate valid TestRail requests on the first try.
      28
      1,548
      37
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no risk of confusion between tools. The agent will correctly select generate_test_suite for its intended purpose.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name 'generate_test_suite' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, which is a common and predictable convention. Consistency is not an issue with only one tool.

    Tool Count3/5

    The server has only one tool, which is on the lower end of the acceptable range. While it might be sufficient for a very focused purpose (generating test suites), the scope feels thin compared to typical servers in this domain.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool provides a single operation for test suite generation. Missing are related operations like listing, updating, or exporting suites, but for a narrowly scoped 'eval' server, it may be acceptable. However, obvious gaps exist for a full test management workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources