Skip to main content
Glama
nirvana124

typesafe-mcp

by nirvana124
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to typesafe-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • jev

      nandansrikrishna
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to evaluate single records or batches with dynamically authored typed questions, returning structured decisions and probabilities.
      MIT

    • mewcp-jev

      AStheTECH
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables structured, rubric-based evaluation of text or structured state using TypeSafe AI's Jev System One API, supporting yes/no, single-choice, and rubric-scored questions in parallel.
      Apache 2.0

    • jev-mcp

      arunav25
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to call TypeSafe's JEV classifier and receive structured, typed judgments with probabilities for binary, choice, and scoring questions.
      1
      7
      MIT

    • jev-mcp

      blakestone-x
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to perform typed judgments—classify, score, check, match, and screen—over closed answer sets with confidence scores, without text generation.
      7
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of an agent confusing it with another. The description clearly defines what 'evaluate' does and its supported question primitives.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    With a single tool, naming inconsistency is impossible. 'evaluate' is a clear, action-oriented verb that accurately describes the tool's purpose.

    Tool Count3/5

    One tool feels thin for a server named 'typesafe-mcp', even though it is not trivial because it packages multiple evaluation primitives. The minimal surface is workable but leaves little room for supporting operations.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool covers the full stated domain: noul, choice, and score questions can be mixed and answered in parallel. No obvious required operations are missing for this narrow evaluation-focused use case.

    Resources