Skip to main content
Glama
nirvana124

typesafe-mcp

by nirvana124
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to typesafe-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • jev

      nandansrikrishna
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to evaluate single records or batches with dynamically authored typed questions, returning structured decisions and probabilities.
      MIT

    • mewcp-jev

      AStheTECH
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables structured, rubric-based evaluation of text or structured state using TypeSafe AI's Jev System One API, supporting yes/no, single-choice, and rubric-scored questions in parallel.
      Apache 2.0

    • jevjam

      beremaran
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents and services to ask small decision models typed questions about text, JSON, images, or video, returning labels, scores, or yes/no answers over MCP tools or a Jev-compatible HTTP API.
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of an agent confusing it with another. The description clearly defines what 'evaluate' does and its supported question primitives.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    With a single tool, naming inconsistency is impossible. 'evaluate' is a clear, action-oriented verb that accurately describes the tool's purpose.

    Tool Count3/5

    One tool feels thin for a server named 'typesafe-mcp', even though it is not trivial because it packages multiple evaluation primitives. The minimal surface is workable but leaves little room for supporting operations.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool covers the full stated domain: noul, choice, and score questions can be mixed and answered in parallel. No obvious required operations are missing for this narrow evaluation-focused use case.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources