Skip to main content
Glama
nirvana124

typesafe-mcp

by nirvana124

Related Servers

Alternatives to typesafe-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to evaluate single records or batches with dynamically authored typed questions, returning structured decisions and probabilities.
      23 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Lets MCP clients submit a situation and typed questions (yes/no, choice, or scale) to a decision model that returns calibrated probabilities plus an act-or-escalate flag. Enables agents to route, flag, approve, check, or rate cases and hand uncertain ones to a person.
      3
      334 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to obtain typed, probabilistic decisions from text or structured state and up to four images—choosing among labeled options, scoring on ordered scales, and estimating whether propositions are true—for routing, triage, moderation, risk scoring, and similar agent workflows.
      5
      0
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables structured, rubric-based evaluation of text or structured state using TypeSafe AI's Jev System One API, supporting yes/no, single-choice, and rubric-scored questions in parallel.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of an agent confusing it with another. The description clearly defines what 'evaluate' does and its supported question primitives.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    With a single tool, naming inconsistency is impossible. 'evaluate' is a clear, action-oriented verb that accurately describes the tool's purpose.

    Tool Count3/5

    One tool feels thin for a server named 'typesafe-mcp', even though it is not trivial because it packages multiple evaluation primitives. The minimal surface is workable but leaves little room for supporting operations.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool covers the full stated domain: noul, choice, and score questions can be mixed and answered in parallel. No obvious required operations are missing for this narrow evaluation-focused use case.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues