typesafe-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to typesafe-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to classify, score, and evaluate content with structured typed decisions via a single generic tool.116 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables agents to evaluate single records or batches with dynamically authored typed questions, returning structured decisions and probabilities.23 PyPIMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceLets MCP clients submit a situation and typed questions (yes/no, choice, or scale) to a decision model that returns calibrated probabilities plus an act-or-escalate flag. Enables agents to route, flag, approve, check, or rate cases and hand uncertain ones to a person.3334 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to obtain typed, probabilistic decisions from text or structured state and up to four images—choosing among labeled options, scoring on ordered scales, and estimating whether propositions are true—for routing, triage, moderation, risk scoring, and similar agent workflows.50MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables structured, rubric-based evaluation of text or structured state using TypeSafe AI's Jev System One API, supporting yes/no, single-choice, and rubric-scored questions in parallel.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables MCP agents to submit content for human review via LoopQuest, returning verdicts asynchronously.25 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of an agent confusing it with another. The description clearly defines what 'evaluate' does and its supported question primitives.
With a single tool, naming inconsistency is impossible. 'evaluate' is a clear, action-oriented verb that accurately describes the tool's purpose.
One tool feels thin for a server named 'typesafe-mcp', even though it is not trivial because it packages multiple evaluation primitives. The minimal surface is workable but leaves little room for supporting operations.
The tool covers the full stated domain: noul, choice, and score questions can be mixed and answered in parallel. No obvious required operations are missing for this narrow evaluation-focused use case.