get_creator_profile

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. The use of 'Fetch' implies a read-only operation, but it does not explicitly state that the tool does not modify data or mention any potential side effects, rate limits, or authentication requirements. It does, however, add context by listing the returned fields, which is helpful.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that starts with the verb and resource, then lists the return fields. No unnecessary words or redundancy, making it highly concise and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with one parameter and no output schema. The description adequately explains what the tool returns (username, launch count, scam estimate, recent coins), which is sufficient for an agent to understand the expected result. Complexity is low, and the description covers the key aspects.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% since the wallet parameter has a clear description ('Creator wallet address'). The tool description does not add any additional meaning beyond the schema; it only lists the fields returned, not further elaboration on the parameter. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool fetches a PumpFun creator profile and lists specific return fields (username, launch count, scam estimate, recent coins). This is a specific verb+resource that distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_token_info or get_github_user.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for retrieving creator profiles but does not explicitly state when to use it versus alternatives or any exclusions. It lacks guidance such as 'use when you need creator details' or when not to use it. The intent is clear from the resource type but not explicitly articulated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.