Skip to main content
Glama
nikshitharapolu

CreditDelta MCP Guardian

by nikshitharapolu
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to CreditDelta MCP Guardian

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • SCML MCP Server

      ravindu57
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to enforce security policies by authorizing tool calls, scanning for prompt injection, checking memory writes, redacting PII, and accessing audit trails through MCP.
      -

    • financial-datasets

      pipeworx-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query financial datasets, including institutional holders, insider transactions, investor portfolios, and SEC filings, via MCP tools.
      MIT

    • SEC EDGAR Data MCP

      SEC-API-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Hosted MCP server granting AI agents access to 20M+ SEC EDGAR filings, 100M+ exhibits, and comprehensive entity data through 49 tools, with support for raw documents, extracted sections, and structured JSON.
      13 npm
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The tools fall into two distinct clusters (guardian/security and financial data) with clear boundaries. Within the guardian cluster, guarded_action and evaluate_tool_call differ by scope (local actions vs. tool calls), and list/resolve/benchmark tools are unambiguous. Financial tools are clearly distinct by resource (company, metrics, comparison). No two tools could be easily confused.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (guarded_action, resolve_approval, list_pending_actions, etc.). Each starts with a clear verb and uses a descriptive noun, making the pattern predictable across both clusters.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 9 tools, the server is well-scoped for its combined purpose of security guard and financial data lookup. Each tool serves a necessary function without redundancy, and the count is comfortably within the ideal 3–15 range.

    Completeness4/5

    The guardian workflow is fully covered: evaluation, execution, approval, pending list, audit log, and benchmarking. Financial data supports search, metric listing, and comparison, but lacks a tool to retrieve raw multi-period values or detailed financial statements, which agents may need to infer from comparisons.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources