Skip to main content
Glama
CreditDelta MCP Guardian

CreditDelta MCP Guardian

Related Servers

Alternatives to CreditDelta MCP Guardian

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to connect to tools and data through a governed MCP endpoint with agent identity, scoped permissions, guardrails, and full audit trails. Access is user-controlled and can be revoked instantly, with every tool call logged by agent identity and timestamp.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to enforce security policies by authorizing tool calls, scanning for prompt injection, checking memory writes, redacting PII, and accessing audit trails through MCP.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query financial datasets, including institutional holders, insider transactions, investor portfolios, and SEC filings, via MCP tools.
      483 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Hosted MCP server granting AI agents access to 20M+ SEC EDGAR filings, 100M+ exhibits, and comprehensive entity data through 49 tools, with support for raw documents, extracted sections, and structured JSON.
      13 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query US stock market and financial data across SEC filings, fundamentals, institutional holdings, insider and congressional trades, earnings transcripts, options, live quotes, IPOs, short interest, macro indicators, and portfolio tracking through MCP tools.
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The tools fall into two distinct clusters (guardian/security and financial data) with clear boundaries. Within the guardian cluster, guarded_action and evaluate_tool_call differ by scope (local actions vs. tool calls), and list/resolve/benchmark tools are unambiguous. Financial tools are clearly distinct by resource (company, metrics, comparison). No two tools could be easily confused.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (guarded_action, resolve_approval, list_pending_actions, etc.). Each starts with a clear verb and uses a descriptive noun, making the pattern predictable across both clusters.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 9 tools, the server is well-scoped for its combined purpose of security guard and financial data lookup. Each tool serves a necessary function without redundancy, and the count is comfortably within the ideal 3–15 range.

    Completeness4/5

    The guardian workflow is fully covered: evaluation, execution, approval, pending list, audit log, and benchmarking. Financial data supports search, metric listing, and comparison, but lacks a tool to retrieve raw multi-period values or detailed financial statements, which agents may need to infer from comparisons.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues