A
licenseA
qualityA
maintenanceMCP server for MiniMax H3 multimodal video generation. Enables text-to-video, image-to-video, and audio-guided video creation with async task retrieval and batch processing.
10
1
MIT
Gemini Omni MCP
by nikships
Related Servers
Alternatives to Gemini Omni MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Google Veo 3.1 video generation. Supports text/video/image-based generation, extension, and interpolation with cost estimation and batch processing.411 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceProduction-grade MCP server for image and video understanding and generation across Gemini, OpenAI, and Grok.5564 PyPI4Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for generating images and videos using Google Gemini and VEO models, with support for multiple AI models and credential modes.33 PyPI1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for 4K video generation using Google VEO 3.1 — text-to-video, image-to-video, video extension, and frame interpolation.1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that exposes Google's Veo2 video generation capabilities, allowing clients to generate videos from text prompts or images.734MIT
TDQS
A3.9/5.0
Scored across 2 tools
Disambiguation4/5
generate_video and batch_generate have clearly separable purposes (single vs. parallel-batch generation), so an agent can pick between them. The main ambiguity is internal to generate_video, which bundles five task modes behind one tool name, but that is parameter-level rather than a collision between two tools.
Naming Consistency4/5
Both names use snake_case and are immediately readable. The only minor deviation is the ordering convention: generate_video is verb_noun while batch_generate is qualifier_verb, but this is a trivial and understandable variation.
Tool Count3/5
Two tools is thin for a video generation server; the entire surface collapses into one overloaded mega-tool plus a batch wrapper. It is defensible because the mega-tool is explicitly scoped, but the count sits in the borderline range flagged by the rubric.
Completeness4/5
The core lifecycle is covered: text/image/reference-to-video generation, editing, extension, and batching, with interaction_id chaining for multi-turn work. There is no dedicated job-status or retrieval/download tool, which is a minor gap for long-running batch jobs.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues