ambari_alerts_getalertsummary

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It only states what the tool does without mentioning read-only nature, performance implications, or prerequisites. The description lacks transparency beyond the basic action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence and very concise. However, it could be more informative while remaining concise, such as mentioning that it returns an overview. Still, it is well-structured and earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool is a simple retrieval with 2 parameters and no output schema, the description is adequate but lacks behavioral context like permissions or return format. It is minimally complete but could be improved with more details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the description does not need to add much. The description mentions 'grouped format' but does not elaborate on how parameters like 'maintenanceFilter' affect the grouping. Baseline of 3 is appropriate as the schema already documents parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it retrieves an alert summary in grouped format for a cluster. The verb 'Get' and resource 'alert summary' are specific, and the qualifier 'in grouped format' distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'ambari_alerts_getalerts' and 'ambari_alerts_getalertdetails'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for getting a grouped summary, but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this vs alternatives. There is no mention of when not to use it or which sibling tool to choose for different needs.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.