charger.get_status
Read the current status of all charger slots to monitor battery charging progress via Bluetooth Low Energy.
Instructions
Read current charger status for all slots.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Read the current status of all charger slots to monitor battery charging progress via Bluetooth Low Energy.
Read current charger status for all slots.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description must carry full burden. It indicates a read-only operation, which is correct, but lacks details like whether a connection is required or how status is returned. Minimal but not contradictory.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, efficient and front-loaded. Every word is necessary and clear.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with no parameters and no output schema, the description adequately states the action. However, it could hint at what 'status' includes or the return format to be fully complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters, and schema coverage is 100%. Baseline for 0 parameters is 4; description adds no param info because none exist, which is acceptable.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description states specific verb 'Read' and resource 'charger status for all slots', clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'charger.start' or 'charger.read_slots'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'charger.get_voltage_curve' or 'charger.read_slots'. The description does not mention any conditions or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/nietonchique/mc3000-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server