MeteoControl MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to MeteoControl MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides comprehensive access to Tigo Energy solar system data and analytics. It enables AI assistants to interact with your Tigo solar monitoring system to retrieve production data, performance metrics, system health information, and maintenance insights.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to look up solar permitting authorities, estimate solar production via PVWatts, and retrieve irradiance data. It streamlines the creation of solar-aware workflows by integrating industry-standard APIs like NREL.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that connects to Felicity Solar cloud battery data, allowing natural language queries about battery status, cell voltages, and charge state.17338 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA lean Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that gives AI assistants like Claude structured access to a SolarEdge PV installation via the official SolarEdge Monitoring API.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for EG4 solar inverters, enabling real-time monitoring, performance analysis, battery health, alerts, maintenance insights, and historical data via natural language.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Solplanet ASW5-T inverter, enabling natural language queries about solar energy system status and control.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_alerts retrieves alerts, get_asset_info provides asset details, get_energy_data handles energy data, and list_systems lists systems. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these functions, making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'get_' or 'list_' prefixes, using snake_case uniformly. This predictable naming scheme enhances readability and reduces confusion for agents.
With 4 tools, the count is reasonable for a server focused on meteorological control, but it feels slightly thin for comprehensive coverage. It includes core functions like alerts, assets, energy data, and systems, but might benefit from additional tools for broader operations.
The tools cover key read operations (get and list), but there are notable gaps in CRUD coverage, such as missing create, update, or delete functions for alerts, assets, energy data, or systems. This could limit agents in performing full lifecycle management tasks.