Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to lnm-writer

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes NeuroGraph's scientific API to AI models as MCP tools, enabling them to query, analyze, and visualize brain networks — regions, tracts, connectivity, literature, and cross-species homologies — drawn from a portable SSD-based neuroimaging data library. Lets models read real atlas data, load datasets, compute graph metrics, and produce visualization scene descriptors without acting as the scientific engine itself.
      12
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables staged, auditable medical literature reviews—search, screening, fetch, and wiki—that produce an evidence-linked Obsidian wiki, with screening decisions, extracted mentions, and synthesis citations checked against stored source text.
      31
      PolyForm Noncommercial 1.0.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables a connected LLM to inspect brain MRI slices as crops and montages with coordinates, compare a region against its mirrored hemisphere, and review the pipeline's candidate hotspots. It lets the model write prioritised "area to review" annotations that appear live in the browser viewer, and move or read the clinician's crosshair position.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables read-only analysis of intracortical spike-level brain-computer-interface recordings, including signal quality, spike detection, firing rates, and cursor-velocity decoding from local or streamed datasets.
      24
      72 PyPI
      1
      Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables read-only cognitive retrospect over Obsidian notes, surfacing stance changes, verifying claims with citable evidence, and avoiding unfounded causal stories via hybrid retrieval and eight read-only MCP tools.
      9
      10
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct role: design listing/classification, paper outlining, guidance retrieval, checklist generation, phrasebook lookup, limitations, and manuscript audit. Even the closely related checklist and audit tools are clearly differentiated by drafting versus finished-text use.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the lnm_ prefix and snake_case convention, and most follow verb_noun naming (list_designs, classify_design, outline_paper, get_guidance, audit_manuscript). A few noun-only names (methods_checklist, phrasebook, limitations) are minor deviations from the pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is well within the ideal range and each tool earns its place by supporting a distinct stage of the study-design-to-manuscript workflow. The count feels neither sparse nor bloated.

    Completeness5/5

    The toolset covers the full workflow this server promises: design identification, paper outlining, guidance retrieval, methods checklisting, phrase support, limitations handling, and final manuscript audit. There are no obvious dead ends or missing stages within its stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues