get_planned_workouts

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must cover behavioral traits. It only indicates a read operation and lists parameters, but omits details like authentication, rate limits, default ordering, error handling, or pagination behavior beyond a limit. Minimal transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, with a front-loaded purpose sentence and a structured parameter list. No unnecessary information. Slight inefficiency in repeating 'Args' header but overall efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has 4 optional parameters and an output schema. The description adequately covers parameter semantics but lacks context on default behavior when no filters are provided, ordering of results, and empty result handling. Adequate but not comprehensive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description adds value by explaining each parameter's role and format (e.g., 'YYYY-MM-DD' for dates, 'Max results to return'). However, explanations are terse and could be more precise (e.g., date ranges inclusive/exclusive, interaction between parameters).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves planned workouts from the coach's training program, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like get_workouts (likely for completed workouts) by specifying 'planned' and 'coach's program'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. It does not mention scenarios where get_workouts or other tools would be more appropriate, nor does it specify prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.