A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceEnables AI assistants to search, update, and manage files, run terminal commands, and automate workflows on a user's computer.
95,635
MIT
Orgo MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Orgo MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI to control a computer through mouse, keyboard, and screen capture tools, with support for local native and Docker sandboxed environments.125MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to control and automate Incus/QEMU virtual machines via SSH, supporting mouse/keyboard, screenshots, commands, and lifecycle management.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables autonomous desktop automation by delegating tasks to vision-based agents operating within cloud-based virtual machine sandboxes. It allows users to manage VMs, execute complex computer tasks, and receive text-based screen summaries across Linux, Windows, and macOS environments.2-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to remotely control gaming PCs for automated gameplay with tools for screen capture, mouse/keyboard control, workflows, and system operations.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides AI agents with fully interactive terminal sessions, including TUI support, keyboard control, and screen capture across Windows, Linux, and Mac.MIT
TDQS
A3.9/5.0
Scored across 35 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but some overlap exists (e.g., orgo_bash vs orgo_exec, orgo_download_file vs orgo_export_file). Descriptions are detailed enough to resolve confusion, but the large number of tools still requires careful reading.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent orgo_verb_noun pattern using snake_case (e.g., orgo_create_computer, orgo_list_projects). The naming is predictable and uniform across the entire set.
Tool Count3/5
35 tools is significantly above the typical 3-15 range, but the broad domain (project/computer management, file operations, AI, streaming) justifies most tools. However, some tools could be consolidated (e.g., start/stop/restart per resource).
Completeness4/5
The tool surface covers CRUD for projects/computers, file operations, AI completions, streaming, and system interaction. Missing are update operations (e.g., update_computer, update_project) and possibly batch file actions, but core workflows are well-supported.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive