Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Orgo MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to operate disposable Linux computers via MCP, providing tools for shell, file read/write, directory listing, and port exposure. It also supports browser automation and integration with any MCP-compatible client.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to control remote desktops through screen capture, mouse movement, and keyboard input.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI to control a computer through mouse, keyboard, and screen capture tools, with support for local native and Docker sandboxed environments.
      7 npm
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to control and automate Incus/QEMU virtual machines via SSH, supporting mouse/keyboard, screenshots, commands, and lifecycle management.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to remotely control multiple computers via MCP: run commands, manage files, install software, view and control screens, and execute parallel tasks across machines.
      132 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 35 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but some overlap exists (e.g., orgo_bash vs orgo_exec, orgo_download_file vs orgo_export_file). Descriptions are detailed enough to resolve confusion, but the large number of tools still requires careful reading.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent orgo_verb_noun pattern using snake_case (e.g., orgo_create_computer, orgo_list_projects). The naming is predictable and uniform across the entire set.

    Tool Count3/5

    35 tools is significantly above the typical 3-15 range, but the broad domain (project/computer management, file operations, AI, streaming) justifies most tools. However, some tools could be consolidated (e.g., start/stop/restart per resource).

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers CRUD for projects/computers, file operations, AI completions, streaming, and system interaction. Missing are update operations (e.g., update_computer, update_project) and possibly batch file actions, but core workflows are well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive