No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 18 tools
Most tools target clearly distinct operations (e.g., disassemble vs. callgraph vs. xrefs_to), but there is minor overlap: find can search labels that labels also lists, and propose_label vs. harvest_names both create proposed labels. Descriptions clarify the boundaries, so confusion is limited.
Tool names mix noun-style (builds, overview, find, class_info, sql) with verb_noun-style (port_labels, make_signature, scan_signature, propose_label, review_label, harvest_names). The pattern is not consistent, though all names remain readable and understandable.
18 tools is slightly above the typical 3–15 range, but each tool covers a distinct aspect of reverse-engineering graph analysis (builds, classes, functions, disassembly, xrefs, callgraph, globals, memory, signatures, labels, SQL). The count is reasonable for the domain, though not minimal.
The surface covers the core lifecycle: build overview, search, class/function/global inspection, disassembly, xrefs, callgraph, signatures, and label proposal/review/listing/porting. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit label deletion or update operation and no xrefs_from tool, but these are workable via SQL or new proposals.
