Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Redacta

Redacta

by nickjlamb
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Redacta

  • PubCrawl

    nickjlamb
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    PubCrawl provides LLMs with access to PubMed, FDA/UK drug labeling, and ClinicalTrials.gov. It enables searching literature, retrieving abstracts and full texts, comparing US and UK drug labels, and exploring clinical trials.
    14
    422 npm
    15
    MIT

Related Servers

  • pseudonym-mcp

    woladi
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Local pseudonymisation MCP server that detects PII in text, replaces it with opaque tokens before sending to cloud LLMs, and restores tokens afterward.
    2
    163 npm
    2
    MIT

  • GDPR Guardian

    FlowLineIntegration
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables irreversible anonymisation of documents and spreadsheets (PDF, Word, PowerPoint, HTML, Excel, CSV) into consistent pseudonymised Markdown before they reach an AI, keeping names, national IDs, bank details and contact data unrecoverable. Runs as a free online HTTP endpoint needing no key, or locally with the full engine bundled so nothing leaves the machine.
    MIT
  • genpark-agentic-zero-knowledge-pii-token-vault-masker-skill

    genpark-agentic-zero-knowledgeofficial

    alphaparkinc
    F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables reversible anonymization of sensitive PII such as SSNs, credit cards, passport numbers, emails, and phone numbers before sending prompts to external LLMs, then restores original values locally using HMAC isolation.
    7
    -
Deploy Server
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Scored across 7 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: protect vs redact are differentiated by legacy status and return behavior, release_to_file vs reinstate by client vs server-side mapping, plus check_output, discard_session, and self_check each occupy unique roles. No ambiguity in selection.

Naming Consistency4/5

All tools use snake_case and a verb-first pattern, though the structure varies (protect, release_to_file, check_output, discard_session, redact, reinstate, self_check). The legacy tools follow the same style but the naming is consistent enough to be predictable.

Tool Count5/5

Seven tools is well-scoped for a redaction/restoration server: core redaction, restoration, leakage checking, session management, and legacy compatibility all have dedicated tools without bloating the surface.

Completeness5/5

The full lifecycle is covered: redaction (protect), restoration (release_to_file), output verification (check_output), session cleanup (discard_session), and leftover scanning (self_check), plus legacy paths. No obvious gaps for the intended domain.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

Resources