Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to OpenGATE

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Explains why two scientific papers disagree. A contradiction explorer for bench scientists that compares two studies' designs and grounds every claim in a verbatim quote from the source text.
    2
    3
    29 npm
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Deployment-readiness harness for AI document-QA and extraction systems. Scaffolds grounding checks, privacy redaction and cost tracking into a project, composing OpenGATE, Redacta and PubCrawl.
    2
    5
    24 npm
    1
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables users to verify citations and bibliographies and to check whether source documents support factual claims, using local inference, exact evidence provenance, and deterministic verdicts.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables language models to verify claims against a local document corpus by returning a literal supporting quote, a contradiction, or an explicit refusal when evidence is insufficient. Runs deterministically offline over local sources without network access or LLM calls.
    4
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents and MCP clients to decompose text into atomic claims and cross-verify them against reference knowledge to flag ungrounded claims, numerical contradictions, and hallucinated entities. Runs deterministically with zero dependencies over JSON-RPC stdio, avoiding LLM round-trips for routine verification tasks.
    7
    -
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    Not graded
    maintenance
    A bounded evidence review engine that ingests documents, extracts evidence for a given claim, detects contradictions, and produces auditable evidence packets without hallucinations or open-web research.
    -
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    MCP server for verifying AI agent claims vs reality — single-transcript inline grounding-check that flags when an agent's response states facts not in the input context, when its code silently swallows exceptions and substitutes mock data, or when its multi-turn transcript contains contradictions or unverified completion claims. Sub-second, local, free, no API calls.
    4
    42 PyPI
    1
    MIT

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Scored across 1 tool

Disambiguation5/5

There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of confusing it with another tool. Its purpose—deterministically checking answer grounding—is clearly distinct and described in detail.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool name uses a clean verb_noun structure (check_grounding) and matches the server's purpose. With only one tool, there are no inconsistent conventions to create confusion.

Tool Count3/5

At one tool, the surface is at the absolute minimum and feels thin compared to typical MCP servers. However, the tool is non-trivial and the server appears intentionally focused on a single grounding-check task, making it borderline rather than egregious.

Completeness4/5

For its stated purpose, the tool covers the major grounding requirements: required facts, numeric traceability, and abstention on unanswerable questions. It lacks related conveniences such as batch checking or detailed failure explanations, but no critical operation for the core workflow is missing.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo issues