OpenGATE
Related Servers
Alternatives to OpenGATE
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceExplains why two scientific papers disagree. A contradiction explorer for bench scientists that compares two studies' designs and grounds every claim in a verbatim quote from the source text.2329 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceDeployment-readiness harness for AI document-QA and extraction systems. Scaffolds grounding checks, privacy redaction and cost tracking into a project, composing OpenGATE, Redacta and PubCrawl.2524 npm1MIT
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables users to verify citations and bibliographies and to check whether source documents support factual claims, using local inference, exact evidence provenance, and deterministic verdicts.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables language models to verify claims against a local document corpus by returning a literal supporting quote, a contradiction, or an explicit refusal when evidence is insufficient. Runs deterministically offline over local sources without network access or LLM calls.4MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents and MCP clients to decompose text into atomic claims and cross-verify them against reference knowledge to flag ungrounded claims, numerical contradictions, and hallucinated entities. Runs deterministically with zero dependencies over JSON-RPC stdio, avoiding LLM round-trips for routine verification tasks.7-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceA bounded evidence review engine that ingests documents, extracts evidence for a given claim, detects contradictions, and produces auditable evidence packets without hallucinations or open-web research.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for verifying AI agent claims vs reality — single-transcript inline grounding-check that flags when an agent's response states facts not in the input context, when its code silently swallows exceptions and substitutes mock data, or when its multi-turn transcript contains contradictions or unverified completion claims. Sub-second, local, free, no API calls.442 PyPI1MIT

Arkheia Hallucinationofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceDetect fabrication and hallucination in any LLM output. Score responses from GPT-4o, Claude, Gemini, Llama and 30+ models. Free tier included.2MIT
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of confusing it with another tool. Its purpose—deterministically checking answer grounding—is clearly distinct and described in detail.
The single tool name uses a clean verb_noun structure (check_grounding) and matches the server's purpose. With only one tool, there are no inconsistent conventions to create confusion.
At one tool, the surface is at the absolute minimum and feels thin compared to typical MCP servers. However, the tool is non-trivial and the server appears intentionally focused on a single grounding-check task, making it borderline rather than egregious.
For its stated purpose, the tool covers the major grounding requirements: required facts, numeric traceability, and abstention on unanswerable questions. It lacks related conveniences such as batch checking or detailed failure explanations, but no critical operation for the core workflow is missing.