A
licenseA
qualityA
maintenanceExplains why two scientific papers disagree. A contradiction explorer for bench scientists that compares two studies' designs and grounds every claim in a verbatim quote from the source text.
2
3
36 npm
2
MIT
OpenGATE
by nickjlamb
Related Servers
Alternatives to OpenGATE
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceDeployment-readiness harness for AI document-QA and extraction systems. Scaffolds grounding checks, privacy redaction and cost tracking into a project, composing OpenGATE, Redacta and PubCrawl.2511 npm1MIT
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceA bounded evidence review engine that ingests documents, extracts evidence for a given claim, detects contradictions, and produces auditable evidence packets without hallucinations or open-web research.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for verifying AI agent claims vs reality — single-transcript inline grounding-check that flags when an agent's response states facts not in the input context, when its code silently swallows exceptions and substitutes mock data, or when its multi-turn transcript contains contradictions or unverified completion claims. Sub-second, local, free, no API calls.423 PyPI1MIT
Arkheia Hallucinationofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceDetect fabrication and hallucination in any LLM output. Score responses from GPT-4o, Claude, Gemini, Llama and 30+ models. Free tier included.1MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA deterministic verification gate for MCP clients that independently checks model outputs against evidence, contradictions, calibration, and provenance without relying on LLM self-assessment.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to verify medical-record claims against synthetic FHIR evidence using a deterministic, non-AI verifier. Provides MCP tools for evidence retrieval, claim verification, and benchmark evaluation without requiring real patient data.2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for grounding verification (exact quotes, citations, code output, repo patterns, arithmetic) using no LLM in the verification path.MIT
TDQS
A4.4/5.0
Scored across 1 tool
Disambiguation5/5
There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of confusing it with another tool. Its purpose—deterministically checking answer grounding—is clearly distinct and described in detail.
Naming Consistency5/5
The single tool name uses a clean verb_noun structure (check_grounding) and matches the server's purpose. With only one tool, there are no inconsistent conventions to create confusion.
Tool Count3/5
At one tool, the surface is at the absolute minimum and feels thin compared to typical MCP servers. However, the tool is non-trivial and the server appears intentionally focused on a single grounding-check task, making it borderline rather than egregious.
Completeness4/5
For its stated purpose, the tool covers the major grounding requirements: required facts, numeric traceability, and abstention on unanswerable questions. It lacks related conveniences such as batch checking or detailed failure explanations, but no critical operation for the core workflow is missing.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues