Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to pqc-migration-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform quantum-resistant cryptographic operations using NIST-standardized algorithms including ML-KEM, ML-DSA, and SPHINCS+. Supports key generation, encryption, digital signatures, and security analysis for post-quantum cryptography research and development.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Defense-grade cryptographic compliance and analysis tools for MCP, including FIPS 140-3 validation, CNSA 2.0 analysis, post-quantum readiness assessment, and classical cipher utilities.
      18
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query an air-gapped enterprise knowledge vault via seven MCP tools for deterministic and hybrid retrieval, entity graph traversal, context compression, archive inspection, onboarding scans, and node status.
      7
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for compliance automation of AI agents, enabling EU AI Act compliance, verifiable credentials, and decentralized identity management with 47 tools across 9 modules.
      67 PyPI
      876
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP tools for video transcoding, document conversion, and multi-step pipelines — callable by any AI agent.
      12
      65 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server providing embedded engineering calculators and code generators as tools for AI agents, enabling precise, deterministic embedded math and C code generation.
      29
      74 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct aspect of PQC migration analysis: failure families, reassembly capacity, submission scoring, credential size, family details, and fragmentation. No overlaps in functionality.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern with underscores (list_failure_families, score_submission, describe_family). 'credential_size' and 'reassembly_window' are noun-like but still clear; 'fragments' is a single noun, slightly deviating.

    Tool Count5/5

    The set includes 6 tools, which is well within the ideal 3-15 range. Each tool addresses a specific need without redundancy, making the scope manageable and focused.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover querying failure families and scoring submissions, but lack submission management, repair retrieval (noted in describe_family), and listing submissions. Some gaps exist for a full workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues