Release Notes MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| GITHUB_TOKEN | Yes | GitHub personal access token with repo access |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| generate_release_notesC | Generate release notes from commits in a given timeframe or commit range |
| analyze_commitsC | Analyze commits and provide statistics |
| configure_templateC | Configure a custom template for release notes |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: analyze_commits focuses on statistics and insights, configure_template handles template customization, and generate_release_notes produces the final output. There is no overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to select the right tool without confusion.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (analyze_commits, configure_template, generate_release_notes). The naming is predictable and readable, with no deviations or mixed conventions.
Three tools are reasonable for a release notes server, covering analysis, configuration, and generation. It is slightly lean but well-scoped; adding a tool for managing templates or historical notes could enhance completeness, but the current count is appropriate for core functionality.
The tool set covers the essential workflow: analyzing commits, configuring templates, and generating release notes. A minor gap exists in operations like updating or deleting templates, but agents can work around this, and the core domain is adequately addressed without dead ends.