Skip to main content
Glama
nickbaumann98

EverArt Forge MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to EverArt Forge MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      An MCP server that integrates with Recraft AI to enable generation and manipulation of high-quality raster and vector images through tools like image generation, editing, vectorization, background removal, and upscaling.
      9
      114 npm
      60
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI-powered image generation using OpenAI's gpt-image-1 and gpt-image-2 models with advanced text rendering and native transparency support.
      20 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI image generation, transformation, and style management via the Recraft API. Provides tools for text-to-image, image-to-image, inpainting, background operations, vectorization, upscaling, and custom style creation.
      16
      24 npm
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides AI image generation and editing capabilities using Google's Gemini 2.5 Flash Image API. It allows users to create new images from text, modify existing files, and perform iterative edits through natural language prompts.
      6
      766 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI image generation, editing, and analysis using Google's Gemini 3.0 models. It supports high-resolution outputs up to 4K, style transfers, and multi-image mixing through specialized tools.
      3
      -

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The three tools have clearly distinct purposes: generate_image creates new images, list_images enumerates stored images, and view_image opens a specific stored image. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these functions, making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool for each task.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case: generate_image, list_images, and view_image. This predictable naming scheme enhances readability and usability, with no deviations or mixed conventions.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only three tools, the server feels thin for an image generation and management domain. While the tools cover basic operations (create, list, view), more advanced functionality like editing, deleting, or organizing images is missing, which could limit agent workflows in practice.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is significantly incomplete for an image management server. There are notable gaps: no ability to delete, update, or organize images (e.g., tagging, moving), and no tools for managing the generation process (e.g., canceling jobs, checking status). This will likely cause agent failures when trying to perform common image-related tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues