jira-dev-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to jira-dev-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables interaction with Jira to fetch issues by key and perform JQL searches. It provides a foundation for integrating multiple work systems, with planned support for Slack and GitHub.542 npmMIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceSmall MCP server for connecting to enterprise Jira using a personal access token. It enables issue operations, project listing, JQL searches, and attachment handling.17-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceCustom MCP server for interacting with Jira, supporting issue management, search, and project operations.542 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA lightweight MCP server that exposes Jira issue operations (get, search, create) as tools for AI clients like Claude.77 npmISC
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA local MCP server that wraps the Jira REST API v3, enabling issue management, searching, commenting, and transitions for openmrs.atlassian.net via Basic Auth.1-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Jira Server/Data Center that enables issue retrieval, JQL search, comment posting, and Tempo worklog queries via the atlassian-python-api.19MIT
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose. The closest pair, jira_read_task and jira_analyze_task, is explicitly disambiguated: one is data-only, the other is a full workflow. Downloading single vs all attachments is also clearly distinguished.
All tools follow a jira_verb_noun pattern except jira_my_tasks, which breaks the convention by using a possessive adjective instead of a verb. Otherwise, naming is highly consistent and predictable.
With 10 tools, the set is well-scoped for a Jira dev integration. Each tool satisfies a distinct need, from project path mapping to comments, search, attachments, and a comprehensive analysis workflow.
The tool surface covers core read, search, comment, attachment, and workflow-driven analysis. Minor gaps exist—no issue creation, status transition, or assignment modification—but these are outside the apparent focus on investigation and commenting.