Delete a recipe comment

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds significant behavioral context beyond the annotations: the annotations already declare destructiveHint=true, but the description reveals the important two-step confirmation requirement and the need to call twice. This is critical behavior not captured by the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is just two short sentences, front-loading the core action. However, it could be slightly more structured or hint at the token parameter names, but it is efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that there is no output schema, the description adequately explains the core behavior and the two-step process. The comment_id source is in the schema. The description is sufficient for a simple tool with good schema coverage, though it could mention what response the first call returns or that the token is temporary.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the description adds minimal value beyond what the schema provides. The description implies the token pattern but does not detail parameter meanings better than the schema's descriptions. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Deletes a comment', which is a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like add_recipe_comment and list_recipe_comments by focusing on deletion, though it does not explicitly contrast with them.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly explains the two-step confirmation process: call once to get a token, then again with that token. This provides clear guidance on when and how to use the tool, and implies that a direct call without the token will not delete, but it does not mention when not to use it or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.