ACC MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to ACC MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA local MCP server giving Claude access to Trimble Connect, with 40 tools for projects, folder trees, files, versions, members, groups, and permissions via the Core API v2.40MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server to control Autodesk Navisworks Manage 2025 from Claude via natural language, enabling model inspection, property search, selection sets, and clash detection.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAI-powered MCP server that enables Claude and other LLMs to interact directly with construction documents, drawings, and specifications through advanced RAG and hybrid search capabilities.9MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets users query, validate, convert, and compare IFC/BIM files using natural language. Runs fully locally and integrates with AI agents like Claude.8MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server connecting Claude to a running Archicad 29 instance for delivery-readiness QA via YAML rules and full Archicad API access, including querying, editing, creating elements, and schedule scheme editing.403MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA remote Model Context Protocol server that lets Claude on claude.ai browse your Autodesk Construction Cloud (ACC) hubs/projects/files and hand you a link that opens the actual model in a hosted Autodesk Viewer page.-
TDQS
Scored across 45 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action (e.g., acc_list_projects vs. acc_get_project, acc_list_folder vs. acc_search_folder). The main risk is among the many 'list' and 'review' tools, but their specific nouns (hubs, projects, reviews, workflows) make them separable.
The vast majority follow a consistent 'acc_verb_noun' pattern (e.g., acc_list_projects, acc_upload_file, acc_set_folder_permissions). A few deviations like acc_auth_status, acc_naming_configs, and acc_cde_structure_template break the pattern slightly, but these are minor and still readable.
With 45 tools, this is well above the 25+ threshold that signals an oversized set. While the scope of ACC is broad, many tools could be combined (e.g., the multiple metadata and review tools), and the count will likely overwhelm agents and increase selection complexity.
The toolset covers the full CDE lifecycle: authentication, project/user management, folder hierarchy, file operations, naming compliance, permissions, and reviews. Notable gaps include no file deletion, no project deletion/update (though the API lacks update), and read-only naming standard, but these are minor and often due to API constraints.