No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 10 tools
The retrieval tools (nmem_situation, nmem_recap, nmem_recall, nmem_context) and the storage tools (nmem_remember, nmem_remember_batch, nmem_todo, nmem_auto, nmem_eternal) heavily overlap, and the descriptions spend significant effort cross-referencing each other ('use nmem_context instead', 'for specific queries use nmem_recall') to compensate. The guidance is helpful but signals genuine boundary blur, so an agent can still misselect among the four recall-style tools.
All names share a uniform nmem_ prefix with lowercase snake_case, which is highly predictable. The only minor deviation is mixing action verbs (remember, recall) with noun-style names (situation, context, eternal, session), but the conventions themselves are consistent.
Ten tools is a reasonable scope for a memory server with distinct storage and retrieval concerns. It is slightly on the heavy side given the functional overlap between recall/situation/context/recap, but each still earns a roughly distinct place.
nmem_todo's description instructs the agent to 'use nmem_forget to close when done,' but no nmem_forget tool exists, creating a real dead end. There is also no delete or update/contradict-resolution tool exposed despite the surface emphasizing memory lifecycle management.