secobserve-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to secobserve-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables LLM agents to query Dynatrace SaaS for observability data (logs, metrics, traces, entities, problems, vulnerabilities) and manage configurations (dashboards, notebooks, SLOs, synthetic monitors, settings).100MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to scan projects for leaked secrets and manage security incidents using GitGuardian's comprehensive API. It supports automated secret detection, honeytoken creation, and remediation workflows to secure codebases without context switching.37MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to scan projects for secrets, manage incidents, and create honeytokens using GitGuardian's API.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables LLMs to perform software composition analysis including license detection, vulnerability assessment, SBOM generation, and policy validation using the SEMCL.ONE toolchain.142Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to query yamory vulnerability management for vulnerability detection, risk assessment, and remediation guidance.510 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents like Claude Desktop to read vulnerability reports, trigger scans, and manage findings for the Inventory Guard self-hosted vulnerability watchdog.-
TDQS
Scored across 18 tools
Each tool targets a distinct operation—CRUD, assessment, import, scan, metrics, VEX—and the cross-references with 'Don't use when' guidance reinforce boundaries. The only close pairs are list_resources vs list and describe_resource vs list_resources, which could confuse by name alone, but the purposes are clearly separated.
All tools share the secobserve_ prefix and most follow verb_noun (list_resources, trigger_scan, run_periodic_task). Deviations include bare verbs (get, list, create, update, delete) and noun-phrase names (status, product_metrics, vex_document), so the pattern is consistent but not uniform.
18 tools is on the high side but justified by the broad vulnerability-management domain: generic CRUD, schema discovery, assessment workflow, import paths, scanning, metrics, and VEX generation each earn their place. It is slightly above the typical well-scoped range, so not a perfect score.
The surface covers the full lifecycle: schema discovery before writes, CRUD for all resources, an audited assessment workflow with bulk and approval steps, multiple ingestion paths, scan triggering, metrics, background jobs, and VEX output. Generic list/get/create/update/delete plus call_action covers long-tail resources, leaving no obvious dead ends.