Skip to main content
Glama
nh4ttruong

secobserve-mcp

by nh4ttruong

Related Servers

Alternatives to secobserve-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to query Dynatrace SaaS for observability data (logs, metrics, traces, entities, problems, vulnerabilities) and manage configurations (dashboards, notebooks, SLOs, synthetic monitors, settings).
      100
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to scan projects for leaked secrets and manage security incidents using GitGuardian's comprehensive API. It supports automated secret detection, honeytoken creation, and remediation workflows to secure codebases without context switching.
      37
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to perform software composition analysis including license detection, vulnerability assessment, SBOM generation, and policy validation using the SEMCL.ONE toolchain.
      14
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents like Claude Desktop to read vulnerability reports, trigger scans, and manage findings for the Inventory Guard self-hosted vulnerability watchdog.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation—CRUD, assessment, import, scan, metrics, VEX—and the cross-references with 'Don't use when' guidance reinforce boundaries. The only close pairs are list_resources vs list and describe_resource vs list_resources, which could confuse by name alone, but the purposes are clearly separated.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the secobserve_ prefix and most follow verb_noun (list_resources, trigger_scan, run_periodic_task). Deviations include bare verbs (get, list, create, update, delete) and noun-phrase names (status, product_metrics, vex_document), so the pattern is consistent but not uniform.

    Tool Count4/5

    18 tools is on the high side but justified by the broad vulnerability-management domain: generic CRUD, schema discovery, assessment workflow, import paths, scanning, metrics, and VEX generation each earn their place. It is slightly above the typical well-scoped range, so not a perfect score.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the full lifecycle: schema discovery before writes, CRUD for all resources, an audited assessment workflow with bulk and approval steps, multiple ingestion paths, scan triggering, metrics, background jobs, and VEX output. Generic list/get/create/update/delete plus call_action covers long-tail resources, leaving no obvious dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessNo issues