tenable-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to tenable-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Nessus vulnerability scans, analyze results, and generate reports through the MCP protocol.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables natural language interaction with Tenable Nessus for vulnerability scans, policy management, and report generation.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes AI-augmented network reconnaissance and evasion capabilities as callable FastMCP tools, enabling natural language orchestration of host discovery, service fingerprinting, CVE mapping, and attack chain synthesis.1-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables natural-language-driven security testing by orchestrating multiple pen-testing tools through MCP, with automated scan execution and AI-assisted vulnerability summarization.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceUnifies NVD, EPSS, CISA KEV, GitHub Advisory, and OSV into a single MCP server, enabling AI agents to query vulnerability intelligence conversationally with 23 tools for incident response, prioritization, dependency audits, and threat monitoring.4135124MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server enabling AI assistants to interact with the Qualys vulnerability management platform. Supports investigation, risk assessment, compliance, remediation, security overview, and report management.92MIT
TDQS
Scored across 17 tools
There is notable overlap between tenable_list_findings and tenable_search_vulnerabilities (both list vulnerabilities using exports API) and between tenable_get_vulnerability_details and tenable_get_plugin_details (get_vuln_details also accepts plugin_id). While descriptions help, agents may struggle to choose the correct tool for vulnerability-related queries.
All tools follow a consistent tenable_<verb>_<noun> pattern using snake_case. Verbs are distinct and the pattern is predictable, making it easy for an agent to infer tool functionality from names.
17 tools cover the key areas of a vulnerability management platform (assets, scans, vulnerabilities, plugins, tags, health, and WAS) without being overwhelming. The count feels appropriate for the domain.
The tool set covers most read and export operations comprehensively, including search, details, and list endpoints. However, it lacks create/update/delete for many resources (e.g., assets, tags, scans) and missing scan lifecycle operations like stop/pause, which are minor gaps for a read-centric server.