node service enable

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate idempotentHint=true and destructiveHint=false. The description adds that it enables at boot, but does not clarify that it does not start the service immediately or mention any permissions required. Minimal added value beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise single sentence. However, it is almost too brief; adding a bit more context (e.g., effect on current state) could improve without sacrificing brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity and present annotations, the description provides the core purpose but lacks clarification on the distinction between enabling at boot and immediate start, which is important given sibling tools. No output schema, but return values are not needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 50% (service has description, node does not). The description adds no parameter information. It does not compensate for the schema's incomplete parameter descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool enables a systemd service at boot. It uses a specific verb ('Enable') and resource ('a systemd service at boot'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like node_service_start or node_service_disable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for setting boot-time enabling, but does not explicitly guide when to use this tool versus alternatives like node_service_start (for immediate start) or node_service_disable (for disabling boot start). No when-not-to-use or prerequisites are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.