Skip to main content
Glama

select

Automate dropdown selection in web testing by specifying a CSS selector and value to choose, enabling precise UI interaction for browser automation tasks.

Instructions

Select an option from a dropdown

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
selectorYesCSS selector for the select element
valueYesValue to select

Implementation Reference

  • Implements the 'select' tool by evaluating JavaScript in the browser to find the select element by CSS selector, set its value, dispatch a change event, and return success message or error if element not found.
    async select(selector, value) {
      await this.ensureChromium();
      
      const result = await this.sendCDPCommand('Runtime.evaluate', {
        expression: `
          const select = document.querySelector('${selector}');
          if (select) {
            select.value = '${value}';
            select.dispatchEvent(new Event('change', { bubbles: true }));
            true;
          } else {
            false;
          }
        `,
        returnByValue: true
      });
      
      if (!result.result?.value) {
        throw new Error(`Select element not found: ${selector}`);
      }
      
      return {
        content: [{ type: 'text', text: `Selected '${value}' in ${selector}` }],
      };
    }
  • Schema definition for the 'select' tool, including name, description, and input schema requiring 'selector' and 'value' parameters.
      name: 'select',
      description: 'Select an option from a dropdown',
      inputSchema: {
        type: 'object',
        properties: {
          selector: {
            type: 'string',
            description: 'CSS selector for the select element',
          },
          value: {
            type: 'string',
            description: 'Value to select',
          },
        },
        required: ['selector', 'value'],
      },
    },
  • index.js:366-367 (registration)
    Registration of the 'select' tool handler in the CallToolRequestSchema switch statement, dispatching to the select method with parsed arguments.
      return await this.select(args.selector, args.value);
    case 'get_console_logs':
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden but offers minimal behavioral insight. It implies a UI interaction but doesn't disclose whether this requires a browser context, what happens on failure (e.g., if selector isn't found), or any side effects. For a tool with zero annotation coverage, this is inadequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with zero waste. It's front-loaded and directly communicates the tool's purpose without unnecessary elaboration, making it easy to parse quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of a UI interaction tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is insufficient. It lacks details on behavioral traits, error handling, or dependencies (e.g., requiring a browser session), leaving significant gaps for an agent to operate effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents both parameters ('selector' and 'value') adequately. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, such as examples or constraints, but doesn't need to compensate for gaps.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Select an option') and target resource ('from a dropdown'), making the purpose immediately understandable. It doesn't differentiate from sibling tools like 'click' or 'fill', but it's specific enough to convey the core function without being tautological.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'click' (for general clicking) or 'fill' (for text input). There's no mention of prerequisites, context, or exclusions, leaving the agent to infer usage from the tool name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/nfodor/claude-arm64-browser'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server