No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 66 tools
Tools are well-organized by resource categories (agent, config, cron, custom_tool, etc.) with clear CRUD operations, making most tools distinct. However, some overlap exists within categories like goclaw_agent_files_set and goclaw_agent_files_create/update are implied but not explicitly separate, and goclaw_health vs goclaw_status might cause minor confusion as both relate to system status.
Naming follows a highly consistent pattern throughout: all tools use snake_case with the prefix 'goclaw_', followed by resource name (e.g., agent, config), and then action verb (e.g., create, list, get, update, delete). This uniformity makes the tool set predictable and easy to navigate.
With 66 tools, the count is excessive for an MCP server, likely overwhelming for agents and indicating poor scoping. While the domain (GoClaw gateway management) is broad, this many tools suggests fragmentation rather than a cohesive set, making it difficult to manage and use effectively.
The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for managing a GoClaw gateway, including agents, channels, config, cron jobs, custom tools, MCP servers, memory, models, providers, sessions, skills, teams, and traces. Each category has full CRUD operations and additional utilities, leaving no obvious gaps for the inferred domain.